Video 0:34
Video
Blostein Overly Architects Proposes Ghosthaus Pocket Park at 195 S. Washington Ave.
Read the full articleA Certificate of Appropriateness filing calls for a 'Remolition' converting a deteriorated house into an adaptive site reuse garden.
How we know this
The sources and records behind this story, with the facts they support.
COA2601052 · Certificate of Approval/Appropriateness — 195 S WASHINGTON AVE
Supporting evidence (3)
On Sept. 30, 2026, Bart Overly of Blostein/Overly Architects submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness proposing to demolish a deteriorated residential building at 195 S.
Read supporting passage
195 S Washington Avenue Demolition and replacement with parkscape garden
In application materials, the applicant stated that the house has deteriorated beyond the point of economically or commercially viable renovation and that the neighboring parking lot has encroached upon the parcel.
Read supporting passage
deteriorated beyond the point of economically or commercially viable renovation, and a portion of the site has already been encroached upon by the adjacent parking lot.
The application is currently in progress awaiting staff review and historic commission consideration.
Read supporting passage
Status=In Progress
Supporting evidence (1)
Rather than carrying out a conventional teardown, the firm proposed what it terms a "Remolition," aiming to reconfigure the memory of the site and unfold the walls onto the building footprint to create a public garden.
Read supporting passage
TO RECONFIGURE THE MEMORY OF THE SITE AND PUT IT TO NEW USE: HOUSE BECOMES GARDEN
Supporting evidence (1)
Rather than carrying out a conventional teardown, the firm proposed what it terms a "Remolition," aiming to reconfigure the memory of the site and unfold the walls onto the building footprint to create a public garden.
Read supporting passage
UNFOLD THE WALLS ONTO THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT
Supporting evidence (1)
According to site plans, the proposed garden composition consists of 50 percent reclaimed material, 45 percent landscape material, and 5 percent construction elements.
Read supporting passage
50% RECLAIMED MATERIAL 45% LANDSCAPE MATERIAL 5% CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS
Supporting evidence (1)
The filing frames the teardown as the removal of a historic structure in poor condition and of non-contributing use.
Read supporting passage
REMOVAL OF A HISTORIC STRUCTURE IN POOR CONDITION AND OF NON- CONTRIBUTING USE