DevelopmentPoliticsDevelopment · Government

Blostein Overly Architects Proposes Ghosthaus Pocket Park at 195 S. Washington Ave.

A Certificate of Appropriateness filing calls for a 'Remolition' converting a deteriorated house into an adaptive site reuse garden.

On Sept. 30, 2026, Bart Overly of Blostein/Overly Architects submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness proposing to demolish a deteriorated residential building at 195 S. Washington Ave. and replace it with an adaptive site reuse pocket park titled "Ghosthaus."

Aerial rendering of a proposed pocket park showing brick pavers, a dark stone footprint, a concrete corner wall, and planting beds.
Conceptual rendering submitted by Blostein/Overly Architects shows the proposed Ghosthaus pocket park at 195 S. Washington Ave.Blostein / Overly Architects · Supplied imageImage source

The corner parcel sits adjacent to an asphalt surface parking lot in Downtown Columbus. In application materials, the applicant stated that the house has deteriorated beyond the point of economically or commercially viable renovation and that the neighboring parking lot has encroached upon the parcel. Rather than carrying out a conventional teardown, the firm proposed what it terms a "Remolition," aiming to reconfigure the memory of the site and unfold the walls onto the building footprint to create a public garden.

According to site plans, the proposed garden composition consists of 50 percent reclaimed material, 45 percent landscape material, and 5 percent construction elements. Conceptual drawings show salvaged wall bricks reused as pavers alongside low-maintenance plantings, dark river rock tracing the original foundation footprint, and a low concrete windowseat wall marking the street corner. The applicant also plans to reclaim the paved area lost to the adjoining parking lot.

The filing frames the teardown as the removal of a historic structure in poor condition and of non-contributing use. However, Columbus historic preservation standards typically require applicants to establish substantial structural or economic justification before the city's historic review commission authorizes demolitions. The application materials also leave several open questions, including formal agreements with the adjacent parking lot owner regarding the encroached land and arrangements for long-term maintenance of the garden. The application is currently in progress awaiting staff review and historic commission consideration.

Video0:34

On Sept. 30, 2026, Bart Overly of Blostein/Overly Architects submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness proposing to demolish a deteriorated residential building at 195 S. Washington Ave. and replace it with an adaptive site reuse pocket park titled "Ghosthaus."

Aerial rendering of a proposed pocket park showing brick pavers, a dark stone footprint, a concrete corner wall, and planting beds.
Conceptual rendering submitted by Blostein/Overly Architects shows the proposed Ghosthaus pocket park at 195 S. Washington Ave.Blostein / Overly Architects · Supplied imageImage source

The corner parcel sits adjacent to an asphalt surface parking lot in Downtown Columbus. In application materials, the applicant stated that the house has deteriorated beyond the point of economically or commercially viable renovation and that the neighboring parking lot has encroached upon the parcel. Rather than carrying out a conventional teardown, the firm proposed what it terms a "Remolition," aiming to reconfigure the memory of the site and unfold the walls onto the building footprint to create a public garden.

According to site plans, the proposed garden composition consists of 50 percent reclaimed material, 45 percent landscape material, and 5 percent construction elements. Conceptual drawings show salvaged wall bricks reused as pavers alongside low-maintenance plantings, dark river rock tracing the original foundation footprint, and a low concrete windowseat wall marking the street corner. The applicant also plans to reclaim the paved area lost to the adjoining parking lot.

The filing frames the teardown as the removal of a historic structure in poor condition and of non-contributing use. However, Columbus historic preservation standards typically require applicants to establish substantial structural or economic justification before the city's historic review commission authorizes demolitions. The application materials also leave several open questions, including formal agreements with the adjacent parking lot owner regarding the encroached land and arrangements for long-term maintenance of the garden. The application is currently in progress awaiting staff review and historic commission consideration.

How we know this

The sources and records behind this story, with the facts they support.

  1. COA2601052 · Certificate of Approval/Appropriateness — 195 S WASHINGTON AVE

    City of Columbus · Accela Citizen Access

    Published September 29, 2026 · Accessed September 30, 2026

    Supporting evidence (3)
    • On Sept. 30, 2026, Bart Overly of Blostein/Overly Architects submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness proposing to demolish a deteriorated residential building at 195 S.

      Read supporting passage
      195 S Washington Avenue Demolition and replacement with parkscape garden
    • In application materials, the applicant stated that the house has deteriorated beyond the point of economically or commercially viable renovation and that the neighboring parking lot has encroached upon the parcel.

      Read supporting passage
      deteriorated beyond the point of economically or commercially viable renovation, and a portion of the site has already been encroached upon by the adjacent parking lot.
    • The application is currently in progress awaiting staff review and historic commission consideration.

      Read supporting passage
      Status=In Progress
  2. Page 3

    ca.columbus.gov

    Accessed September 30, 2026

    Supporting evidence (1)
    • Rather than carrying out a conventional teardown, the firm proposed what it terms a "Remolition," aiming to reconfigure the memory of the site and unfold the walls onto the building footprint to create a public garden.

      Read supporting passage
      TO RECONFIGURE THE MEMORY OF THE SITE AND PUT IT TO NEW USE: HOUSE BECOMES GARDEN
  3. Page 4

    ca.columbus.gov

    Accessed September 30, 2026

    Supporting evidence (1)
    • Rather than carrying out a conventional teardown, the firm proposed what it terms a "Remolition," aiming to reconfigure the memory of the site and unfold the walls onto the building footprint to create a public garden.

      Read supporting passage
      UNFOLD THE WALLS ONTO THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT
  4. Page 8

    ca.columbus.gov

    Accessed September 30, 2026

    Supporting evidence (1)
    • According to site plans, the proposed garden composition consists of 50 percent reclaimed material, 45 percent landscape material, and 5 percent construction elements.

      Read supporting passage
      50% RECLAIMED MATERIAL 45% LANDSCAPE MATERIAL 5% CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS
  5. Page 2

    ca.columbus.gov

    Accessed September 30, 2026

    Supporting evidence (1)
    • The filing frames the teardown as the removal of a historic structure in poor condition and of non-contributing use.

      Read supporting passage
      REMOVAL OF A HISTORIC STRUCTURE IN POOR CONDITION AND OF NON- CONTRIBUTING USE